Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: Old 9/11 Documentary Thread
QuickSilverScreen Forum > Documentaries > Documentaries > Paranormal and Conspiracy
Pages: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
dawnierotten
QUOTE(KJC @ Apr 6 2008, 09:12 AM) *
Really? Prior knowledge of Pearl harbor is "fact"?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pearl_Harbor_...nowledge_debate

According to wikipedia it is a controversial idea with no solid evidence.




http://www.devvy.com/pdf/fdr_top_secret.pdf Take that to your history class. NEXT! I'm done debating the ignorant; waste of time. If you can't see all of the evidence that was laid out for you at this point in time, you NEVER will. Your loss, not ours. "We" know what's coming and are prepared for it. Sucks to be you. Bye. biggrin.gif
Truthiness
QUOTE(dawnierotten @ Apr 6 2008, 05:15 PM) *
http://www.devvy.com/pdf/fdr_top_secret.pdf Take that to your history class. NEXT! I'm done debating the ignorant; waste of time. If you can't see all of the evidence that was laid out for you at this point in time, you NEVER will. Your loss, not ours. "We" know what's coming and are prepared for it. Sucks to be you. Bye. biggrin.gif


I agree. Buh Bye.
MovieWatcher3

Memories of Conspiracy Theory 1 http://www.veoh.com/videos/v1428219RkRxpfFr

Memories of Conspiracy Theory 2 http://www.veoh.com/videos/v1428229HAhfMeD8

Memories of Conspiracy Theory 3 http://www.veoh.com/videos/v1428248NHtdTfGR

Memories of Conspiracy Theory 4 http://www.veoh.com/videos/v1428277Gygrpkgc

Memories of Conspiracy Theory 5 http://www.veoh.com/videos/v1428325ffXNGpjk

Memories of Conspiracy Theory 6 http://www.veoh.com/videos/v1428329NCPTQS3S

Memories of Conspiracy Theory 7 http://www.veoh.com/videos/v14283394m6jtq8G

Welcome to the Conspiracy Wars about 911. A film by Abby Scott and Ray Rivera http://www.veoh.com/videos/v311691mmnP4zFT?confirmed=1

Zeitgeist http://www.veoh.com/videos/v1590771n6zFpQhM
KJC
Masturbatory material for those without a brain. Whatever makes you happy. This is entertainment, not documentary.
Robfails
Lol smile.gif You guys are funny smile.gif

I love the amount of media on this subject tongue.gif

Its like, Careface, Some Guys crashed into a building. NO SIR, Its a conspiracy.

Frankly who cares eh smile.gif

Nothing me you or anyone else can do about it now.

WoopWoop This planet sure is interesting.

Less Internet tough guys though. Im all small and emo mmk.
hardup
QUOTE(dawnierotten @ Apr 6 2008, 02:50 AM) *
I don't know where to start on this one!!
You are in collage and are a history major?? Might I suggest you ask for a refund. Because you DO NOT know your history. I also might add that the history books that are in classrooms are not accurate. Case and point: Roosevelt had Intel BEFORE the attack on Pearl Harbor and did NOTHING about it because he needed a reason to enter WW II. Now, WHERE does it state THAT in your "history" books?? BTW...that is a known FACT. Since you are a history major and I hail from the Cherokee Tribe, I wonder if you can open up your little history book and teach ME about the "history" of my People??? What does it say in your little history book?? I'll tell you right now....the history books are WRONG!!
Another thing.....you might want to take an English/Spelling class. It's spelled guarantee NOT garantie! LMAO!
"I garantie your country has a bad past and hasn't Put the work we have into helping countries that ask for it." That statement is also FALSE! The US has destroyed more countries, started more wars and MURDERED more people than any other country on the planet. <Def ask for a refund because you obviously haven't learned shit! lolol>. "little euro country"???? LOL.....ummm.....I think maybe you might want to take an economic class in between your frat parties.....the value of the US dollar is <way> DOWN against the "little Euro"!! We stupid Americans will soon be wiping our asses with our $$$ because it will soon be WORTHLESS!
"You guys look at hearsay and theory as proof or evidence lol." You're so obviously ignorant and there isn't anything anyone can say and/or present to you that hasn't already been presented that will change your mind; so, you are a waste of time!! The EVIDENCE is in the docs that were made known to you. PERIOD! If you can't process that information in that pea brain of yours, well, that's your problem!! NOT OURS!
If you feel so STRONGLY about your views, WHY aren't you signed up for serving your country and in Iraq fighting those "terrorists bastards"???? Gimmie your address and I'll pick you up and give you a ride to your local recruiting office. PUT UP OR SHUT UP!! Coward???? rolleyes.gif



HAHA ok Nut Case. WE planned pearl harbor too and we wanted to get into ww2 with the germans so hey y
don't we let the JAPS bomb us rofl. What a fucking dip shit. WE had some intel on the japs. But like
intel its good or bad or not on time or people in the head office don't read as much as they should
into it. That does NOT mean conspiracy dumb shits,............... Get off the reservation and learn
somthing thats not on the net you ignorant bastard. I'm 1/6th native american so stfu, my grandma is
full. Your words mean nothing trying to poke your race in it. The other half of my family didn't get
here till 100 years ago, don't blame me for shit my people didn't do. Just like a lot of americans
that are immigrants and had nothing to do with slavery or murdering indians. They did kill a lot of
indians, tons of them. But its not like we didn't fight our own kind. Indians killed indians too durr.
A lot of it was France, England and Spain not America daaa. Hum lets see here we killed more than any
one els on this planet eh... Like to see your numbers on that one. Can you show me some proof. No you can't cause you made that up rofl. I guess germans killing over 40 million in 6 years was no big deal. Russia under Stalin and Linen killed 40 million of its own people, 20 more to ww2. Romans didn't have a big population pool to kill from, but they did so on a scale that if it was today it would be horrific. Not to mention inslavment to there empire. Japs killed a lot of
Chineses in ww2, Africans killed millions of africans. Muslims killed millions. Korean communist killed
millions. So did the Vietnamese communist. Belgium killed tons of Africans in the congo. Your lack of knowledge leads you to belive these (so called)few isolated instances are so horrific but you should try to learn the full scope of history. You will then see how many slaughters you dont even know about. Do you think all the bad shit is isloated to the last few hundred years? lol. Horrific shit has happend throughout time. HUM want me to go back 3,000 years and come to the present just to prove your an uneducated dip shit that listens to net blabber and thinks it information lol. You Don't know a damn thing about the past. Your trying to tell me something rofl. Unlike you I can research many information sources and come up with a rational idea... You say put up or shut up when I'm talking about going up in arms against my country and you twist it and say go to iraq rofl. make up your mind did americans do it or terrorist. Just so you know most of my family is military. Back in ww2
both grandpas fought. Uncles fought in vietnam and korea (won medals). I have a brother in iraq on his
3rd tour. I tryed to get in but cause of my epilepsy it was a no go. You don't know shit about me but
you talk like you know it all lol. More proof your an idiot making shit up. wow the euro is worth more
cause we are spending trillions on the war and we still give way more in foreign aid than euros give
durr. Money goes up and down. "little euro country"???? LOL.....ummm.....I think maybe you might
want to take an economic class" What does that have to do with what I said rofl dumb
ass. Just like a liberal to twist or change the subject. I was talking about how we helped out more
countries than anyone els. With more food more medicine more everything than the E.U.. More than any
country or empire EVER. No country has given so much to others period ....There wouldn't be a damn
euro if not for america stfu idiot, we saved there asses 2 count it.... twice. Plus we felt bad for
the germans getting fucked over by the russians so we flew the most coordinated and time consuming air
operation ever. Air dropping food for the germans under commy control. Even after what they did to the
world... You don't know shit. I could go on for hundreds of pages but you guys wouldn't learn a
fucking thing with your 30 iQ's. Will take to much of my REAL life to prove to you idiots that 911 was
NOT an inside job. YOU PEOPLE GET A LIFE and while your at it A BRAIN might help you out too. I really
find it funny how these conspiracy nuts try so hard to sound smart but everything they says is
ignorant and twisted with no rational foundation. Make more shit up people lol some stupid ass might
belive a word you say. Unlike them I can see how idiotic your thinking is conspiracy girl. You people
really have no clue how crazy you are. How do you get a crazy person that says clouds in the sky are
flouting animals to understand that clouds are really made of watter vapor trapped with dirt and
pressure? It just won't happen. Have fun crazy people, get on meds. My I suggest thorazine for your paranoid schizophrenia.
SYLver
QUOTE
911 and the British Broadcasting Conspiracy


QUOTE
911 and the British Broadcasting Conspiracy - new documentary by Adrian Connock and David Shayler about the BBC's selective and distorted ... all » 911 coverage. With particular reference to the Conspiracy Files programme aired on BBC Two on February 18th 2007






My First Contribute To 9/11 Doc. Enjoy happy.gif


akron
QUOTE(SYLver @ Apr 8 2008, 04:55 PM) *
My First Contribute To 9/11 Doc. Enjoy happy.gif



Welcome! Prepare to have your understanding of things lynched by the hardline officionatos.....I mean enjoy the silly comments on your post.

Nevertheless nice one!!
KJC
QUOTE(Truthiness @ Apr 12 2008, 03:37 PM) *
Interpreting Media (NLP) Neuro-Linguistic Programming

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4gKpA_vTG30


Very ironic that truthers call skeptics manipulative. laugh.gif

The fundamental point of conspiracy theories is that the manipulate facts, tell half truths, or outright lies.

Even conspiracy theorists often can't agree with each other on the 'facts'. Sometimes a rocket hits the WTC, sometimes there are no passengers on the planes, sometimes flight 93 was shot down, sometimes it landed safely in Cleveland. Even Dylan Avery and his pal agreed that the bowing of the tower proves the towers collapsed due to fire, but that the rest of the tower was controlled demolition, then in the later version of Loose Change, they went back to saying that the tower could not have collapsed at all due to fire.

What's it to be? Conspiracy theorists are tripping over themselves with so much manipulation that is flying around in a contradictory fashion.
Truthiness
QUOTE(KJC @ Apr 12 2008, 03:57 PM) *
Very ironic that truthers call skeptics manipulative. laugh.gif

The fundamental point of conspiracy theories is that the manipulate facts, tell half truths, or outright lies.

Even conspiracy theorists often can't agree with each other on the 'facts'. Sometimes a rocket hits the WTC, sometimes there are no passengers on the planes, sometimes flight 93 was shot down, sometimes it landed safely in Cleveland. Even Dylan Avery and his pal agreed that the bowing of the tower proves the towers collapsed due to fire, but that the rest of the tower was controlled demolition, then in the later version of Loose Change, they went back to saying that the tower could not have collapsed at all due to fire.

What's it to be? Conspiracy theorists are tripping over themselves with so much manipulation that is flying around in a contradictory fashion.


It's to be the truth. I agree with Alex Jones' Endgame as a conspiracy theory.
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=10...600562261&q
KJC
QUOTE(Truthiness @ Apr 12 2008, 04:08 PM) *
It's to be the truth. I agree with Alex Jones' Endgame as a conspiracy theory.
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=10...600562261&q


That's not a reply. But Alex Jones is typical of a truther when confronted with facts. I remember a youtube clip of Alex Jones outside ground zero with his band of followers chanting "inside job" and Mark Roberts went up to him and debated WTC7 with him. When confronted with facts, Alex Jones had absolutely NO REPLY. Instead he began high fiving his supporters without answering the question and went back to chanting. It was a toe curling moment. I was embarrassed for him.

Out of all the brands of 9/11 truthers, none of them can actually face questions in a credible manner against someone like Mark Roberts. It was Mark Roberts who even got Dylan Avery to admit the towers collapsed due to fire... but the fact this was not in the subsequent version of Loose Change is a big red flag with "liar" written on it.
Truthiness
QUOTE(KJC @ Apr 12 2008, 04:47 PM) *
That's not a reply. But Alex Jones is typical of a truther when confronted with facts. I remember a youtube clip of Alex Jones outside ground zero with his band of followers chanting "inside job" and Mark Roberts went up to him and debated WTC7 with him. When confronted with facts, Alex Jones had absolutely NO REPLY. Instead he began high fiving his supporters without answering the question and went back to chanting. It was a toe curling moment. I was embarrassed for him.

Out of all the brands of 9/11 truthers, none of them can actually face questions in a credible manner against someone like Mark Roberts. It was Mark Roberts who even got Dylan Avery to admit the towers collapsed due to fire... but the fact this was not in the subsequent version of Loose Change is a big red flag with "liar" written on it.


Like Jones would back down from shit. Just watch Endgame and wake the fuck up.

Alex Jones - FBI Confrontation http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oqNUGDn3F9M...feature=related

Alex Jones arrested for refusing to thumbscan http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ptsbCwcbrfc...feature=related
hardup
QUOTE(Truthiness @ Apr 12 2008, 11:07 AM) *
Like Jones would back down from shit. Just watch Endgame and wake the fuck up.

Alex Jones - FBI Confrontation http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oqNUGDn3F9M...feature=related

Alex Jones arrested for refusing to thumbscan http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ptsbCwcbrfc...feature=related

ALex jones is one of the biggest idiots in the world rofl. I can't belive you people listen to guys like this. You wonder y people call insiders crazy, it's cause you follow people like alex jones. I too saw that video and ROFL. He looked like a moron giving high 5's to people and not responding to the question. He's about as crazy as rosie o'donnell. When you look at her eyes you can tell that no wheels are turning upstairs. She makes crap up or just repeats bullshit she heard like alex joes does rofl.
Truthiness
"Out of all the brands of 9/11 truthers, none of them can actually face questions in a credible manner against someone like Mark Roberts. It was Mark Roberts who even got Dylan Avery to admit the towers collapsed due to fire... but the fact this was not in the subsequent version of Loose Change is a big red flag with "liar" written on it."

Roberts is a putz. Dylan Avery and Jason Bermas were young when they made Loose Change, and admit it had errors. But let's let everyone decide for themselves.

Loose Change Debate 911 Program
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y7tMHMQ863Q
KJC
QUOTE(Truthiness @ Apr 12 2008, 08:28 PM) *
"Out of all the brands of 9/11 truthers, none of them can actually face questions in a credible manner against someone like Mark Roberts. It was Mark Roberts who even got Dylan Avery to admit the towers collapsed due to fire... but the fact this was not in the subsequent version of Loose Change is a big red flag with "liar" written on it."

Roberts is a putz. Dylan Avery and Jason Bermas were young when they made Loose Change, and admit it had errors. But let's let everyone decide for themselves.

Loose Change Debate 911 Program
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y7tMHMQ863Q


On what basis are you calling Mark Roberts a putz? He is a sensible honest person - two traits a conspiracy nut does not have to rub together. Oh, and don't forget a thing called integrity.

As for Dylan Avery's omission that Loose Change had errors... Why then did he and Jason agree on that program that the top half of the towers fell due to fire damage and in the version of Loose Change that came out 1 year later go back to saying the tower couldn't collapse due to fire damage?

The answer to me is obvious... Dylan and co are very well aware of the facts, but for their own interests are deliberately using spin in their "documentary".
akron
ffs KJC you must have the same narrow mindset as that roberts idiot. Watch the 2 episodes and ask yourself what part of government funded isn't clear? and get over 9/11 all together. The situation as it is will be the end of the story for who knows how long. The aftermath of 9/11 and the war on terror/iraq/iran, the formation of new superstates and the constant 'thread' of fear we're hanging on is the reality.
When you look at the numbers EU is a bigger military power yet under disguise of UN /nato very ellusive. I feel sorry for what the US does to it's citizens but in europe the situation is almost as hopeless , even worse if you consider most europeans don't believe their(?) government would use such media tactics on them.
It's an invasion of (unwilling/knowing) sheeple and that will probably manifest itself this june in Ireland with the treaty referendum(not meant @ the irish, meant @ the rest not knowing this is for the whole union).It's the end of democracy in the west as we knew it one could say.
European press has imo never been more turned inward on the home country neglecting even neighbouring countries. Next to that the usual reuters/ap bs concernin anything.
We're running towards a situation fused by oil/energy/food/water wars and a bunch of colliding egotistical superpowers capable of wiping us out in more than one way several times. I know this sounds like preeching but it's all facts even given on tv, not coherent though (rings a bell??)

Get a broader scope than USA and maybe then you'll get why you can't let officials or governments do these things in the name of democracy and the free world. If anything they should release the footage of the pentagon shot with security camera's (not the 2 crappy frames) from surrounding buildings and be put to trial, under oath, alone. All of them.
Truthiness
There is a big picture coming weather people like it or not.
akron
QUOTE(Truthiness @ Apr 15 2008, 03:43 AM) *
There is a big picture coming weather people like it or not.



please explain
Truthiness
QUOTE(akron @ Apr 15 2008, 12:31 PM) *
please explain


New World Order http://youtube.com/watch?v=NnxNfUWLOHk
Truthiness
We Are Punks!

http://www.livevideo.com/media/playvideo_f...20EA2FEB958721E
Truthiness
Enemy of The New World Order State - The Civilians Military

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eZMDcD2mZRM
Truthiness
American Patriot Revolution Against The New World Order

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WNZrAe0IuNk
Truthiness
No Fool - by Social Service ® Livevideo

http://www.livevideo.com/media/playvideo_f...1C1F4B405BEA24A
KJC
QUOTE(akron @ Apr 13 2008, 10:07 PM) *
ffs KJC you must have the same narrow mindset as that roberts idiot. Watch the 2 episodes and ask yourself what part of government funded isn't clear?


That is your answer to everything isn't it? Anything that contradicts your worldview is 'government funded'. It is you that is the idiot, not me or Mark Roberts. Me and him have an open mind, but your mind is so open your brain falls out. You just want to find any little thing to blame on the people in power.

QUOTE
Get a broader scope than USA and maybe then you'll get why you can't let officials or governments do these things in the name of democracy and the free world. If anything they should release the footage of the pentagon shot with security camera's (not the 2 crappy frames) from surrounding buildings and be put to trial, under oath, alone. All of them.


Why should they (whoever "they" are) be put on trial? What evidence is there of wrong doing? This is like saying "lets take NASA to court since the moon landings were faked". Complete fucking stupidity.

And what about the Pentagon footage? Dozens of eye witnesses saw a plane, the damage to the building suggests plane, the airline confirms plane, air traffic control confirms plane, wreckage at the site confirms plane, relatives of the victims suggest plane, the broken poles suggest and object with wingspan hit the building. So what the fuck do you think hit the building bearing ALL this evidence in mind? You have nothing and you are just kicking up a song and dance because there may be unreleased footage of the crash. I can imagine you would be making the same song and dance about the WTC if there were no footage... but guess what, passenger jets hit the WTC with or without footage and it is the same with the Pentagon - We have more than enough evidence of this without the footage being required.

Have fun in your rightful home - paranormal & conspiracy forum. LOL!
Truthiness
Conspiracy Theory

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conspiracy_theory

9/11 conspiracy theories

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/9/11_conspiracy_theories
akron
QUOTE(KJC @ Apr 25 2008, 01:01 PM) *
That is your answer to everything isn't it? Anything that contradicts your worldview is 'government funded'. It is you that is the idiot, not me or Mark Roberts. Me and him have an open mind, but your mind is so open your brain falls out. You just want to find any little thing to blame on the people in power.
Why should they (whoever "they" are) be put on trial? What evidence is there of wrong doing? This is like saying "lets take NASA to court since the moon landings were faked". Complete fucking stupidity.

And what about the Pentagon footage? Dozens of eye witnesses saw a plane, the damage to the building suggests plane, the airline confirms plane, air traffic control confirms plane, wreckage at the site confirms plane, relatives of the victims suggest plane, the broken poles suggest and object with wingspan hit the building. So what the fuck do you think hit the building bearing ALL this evidence in mind? You have nothing and you are just kicking up a song and dance because there may be unreleased footage of the crash. I can imagine you would be making the same song and dance about the WTC if there were no footage... but guess what, passenger jets hit the WTC with or without footage and it is the same with the Pentagon - We have more than enough evidence of this without the footage being required.

Have fun in your rightful home - paranormal & conspiracy forum. LOL!



LOL haha reading and understanding what you just read is obviously your problem read the posts as a dialog and things just don't ad up and that's the last of it.
have fun in your rightful home of narrowmindedness, I'm convinced you're an american for the simple fact you comply very well to what they call patriotism, yes they.
Try getting a broader scope than 9/11 and planes IDIOT and your statements about footage and government funding being that what isn't my view are just awesome smile.gif , bushie words

I wanna ask you to give us some of your sources, you know NIST raport and such (which is rediculous no matter how many pages since it doesn't explain the collapse (wtc1&2) or building 7 or the molten steel or any other question asked outside the pentagon who are under suspicion of a lot more than JUST 9/11)

eye witnesses aren't reliable (fact, plus lot's of eyewitnesses saw a plane but no commercial airliner) plus planes fly fast so there is a world of difference if they (pentagon,bush admin) released more footage (estimates are they have over 50 confiscated tapes,researched) that actually shows the plane and not some far away 5 frame shot sith something way too small for an airliner hitting the pentagon.

Try to think
KJC
QUOTE(akron @ Apr 26 2008, 10:42 PM) *
LOL haha reading and understanding what you just read is obviously your problem read the posts as a dialog and things just don't ad up and that's the last of it.
have fun in your rightful home of narrowmindedness, I'm convinced you're an american for the simple fact you comply very well to what they call patriotism, yes they.
Try getting a broader scope than 9/11 and planes IDIOT and your statements about footage and government funding being that what isn't my view are just awesome smile.gif , bushie words


Firstly, I am not American and certainly not pro Bush.

I am talking about 9/11 and 9/11 only. The fact you unjustifiably want to connect 9/11 with your irrational libertarian views just shows that you don't care about facts, but rather you have some perverted desire to have an apocalyptic view of the world.

This is why I always ignore your libertarian rants because they have absolutely nothing to do with 9/11. It isn't even close to being circumstantial evidence.

QUOTE
I wanna ask you to give us some of your sources, you know NIST raport and such (which is rediculous no matter how many pages since it doesn't explain the collapse (wtc1&2) or building 7 or the molten steel or any other question asked outside the pentagon who are under suspicion of a lot more than JUST 9/11)


I have not read the 10,000 pages of the NIST report, and for some reason, I don't suspect you read a word of it either. But I did see a video of someone from NIST explaining the collapse which is what any respected expert agrees with: The trusses in the towers bowed as was visible from hundreds of pictures the trusses then gave way at the point of bowing and we see dozens of floors above suddenly fall on top of the floors below. NIST says this force was enough for all of the floors below to give way due to the momentum and gravity of the floors above.

Do you have any idea how difficult or even impossible it would be to set up demolition material from top to bottom of the towers with nobody noticing? Do you have any idea how difficult it would be for a plane to crash into the building without immediately detonating the demolition material OR to render them immediately ineffective? Do you have any idea how difficult it would be for the demolition team to start the demolition procedure from the EXACT point the tower was bowing? Do you have any idea how difficult it would be for the explosives to go off at the exact moment the floors above come into contact with the floors at collapse point?

Lets put ourselves in the shoes of the alledged conspirators on 9/11. Why even attempt such an impossible demolition? You would almost certainly be found out when it failed to go as planned. Why isn't it enough for the planes to just crash into the building? The controlled demolition theory doesn't even have a logical motive.

Whatever NIST does and does not say about the collapse, controlled demolition is not in any circumstance a possible theory. The reason no experts in controlled demolition support this theory is because they know simply by looking at the collapse that it was not a controlled demolition. Of all the movies made about the conspiracy theory, I don't think there is one expert of demolition in any of those movies.

QUOTE
eye witnesses aren't reliable (fact, plus lot's of eyewitnesses saw a plane but no commercial airliner) plus planes fly fast so there is a world of difference if they (pentagon,bush admin) released more footage (estimates are they have over 50 confiscated tapes,researched) that actually shows the plane and not some far away 5 frame shot sith something way too small for an airliner hitting the pentagon.

Try to think


Oh, so suddenly you are saying eye witnesses are not reliable, but yet you will no doubt use eye witness statements when it suits your agenda?

And secondly, whatever hit the Pentagon, it was NOT small! How many more times do I have to explain this? Damaged lamp posts over a wide area shows that something with WING SPAN hit the Pentagon. The airliner and air traffic controllers and wreckage at the Pentagon confirm this.
akron
QUOTE(KJC @ Apr 29 2008, 04:41 AM) *
Firstly, I am not American and certainly not pro Bush.

I am talking about 9/11 and 9/11 only. The fact you unjustifiably want to connect 9/11 with your irrational libertarian views just shows that you don't care about facts, but rather you have some perverted desire to have an apocalyptic view of the world.

This is why I always ignore your libertarian rants because they have absolutely nothing to do with 9/11. It isn't even close to being circumstantial evidence.
I have not read the 10,000 pages of the NIST report, and for some reason, I don't suspect you read a word of it either. But I did see a video of someone from NIST explaining the collapse which is what any respected expert agrees with: The trusses in the towers bowed as was visible from hundreds of pictures the trusses then gave way at the point of bowing and we see dozens of floors above suddenly fall on top of the floors below. NIST says this force was enough for all of the floors below to give way due to the momentum and gravity of the floors above.

Do you have any idea how difficult or even impossible it would be to set up demolition material from top to bottom of the towers with nobody noticing? Do you have any idea how difficult it would be for a plane to crash into the building without immediately detonating the demolition material OR to render them immediately ineffective? Do you have any idea how difficult it would be for the demolition team to start the demolition procedure from the EXACT point the tower was bowing? Do you have any idea how difficult it would be for the explosives to go off at the exact moment the floors above come into contact with the floors at collapse point?

Lets put ourselves in the shoes of the alledged conspirators on 9/11. Why even attempt such an impossible demolition? You would almost certainly be found out when it failed to go as planned. Why isn't it enough for the planes to just crash into the building? The controlled demolition theory doesn't even have a logical motive.

Whatever NIST does and does not say about the collapse, controlled demolition is not in any circumstance a possible theory. The reason no experts in controlled demolition support this theory is because they know simply by looking at the collapse that it was not a controlled demolition. Of all the movies made about the conspiracy theory, I don't think there is one expert of demolition in any of those movies.
Oh, so suddenly you are saying eye witnesses are not reliable, but yet you will no doubt use eye witness statements when it suits your agenda?

And secondly, whatever hit the Pentagon, it was NOT small! How many more times do I have to explain this? Damaged lamp posts over a wide area shows that something with WING SPAN hit the Pentagon. The airliner and air traffic controllers and wreckage at the Pentagon confirm this.


thank you says it all. It is you who can't step out of his own mindset since loads of docs give reasons enough as a motive!
nevertheless I'm gonna let you go ahead and attack every post in here cause this whole topic is insane in your opinion. Says it all
pentagon wreckage? a blip on a screen? the point is they got better video material.
however I'm leaving it a
akron
QUOTE(KJC @ Apr 29 2008, 04:41 AM) *
Firstly, I am not American and certainly not pro Bush.

I am talking about 9/11 and 9/11 only. The fact you unjustifiably want to connect 9/11 with your irrational libertarian views just shows that you don't care about facts, but rather you have some perverted desire to have an apocalyptic view of the world.

This is why I always ignore your libertarian rants because they have absolutely nothing to do with 9/11. It isn't even close to being circumstantial evidence.
I have not read the 10,000 pages of the NIST report, and for some reason, I don't suspect you read a word of it either. But I did see a video of someone from NIST explaining the collapse which is what any respected expert agrees with: The trusses in the towers bowed as was visible from hundreds of pictures the trusses then gave way at the point of bowing and we see dozens of floors above suddenly fall on top of the floors below. NIST says this force was enough for all of the floors below to give way due to the momentum and gravity of the floors above.

Do you have any idea how difficult or even impossible it would be to set up demolition material from top to bottom of the towers with nobody noticing? Do you have any idea how difficult it would be for a plane to crash into the building without immediately detonating the demolition material OR to render them immediately ineffective? Do you have any idea how difficult it would be for the demolition team to start the demolition procedure from the EXACT point the tower was bowing? Do you have any idea how difficult it would be for the explosives to go off at the exact moment the floors above come into contact with the floors at collapse point?

Lets put ourselves in the shoes of the alledged conspirators on 9/11. Why even attempt such an impossible demolition? You would almost certainly be found out when it failed to go as planned. Why isn't it enough for the planes to just crash into the building? The controlled demolition theory doesn't even have a logical motive.

Whatever NIST does and does not say about the collapse, controlled demolition is not in any circumstance a possible theory. The reason no experts in controlled demolition support this theory is because they know simply by looking at the collapse that it was not a controlled demolition. Of all the movies made about the conspiracy theory, I don't think there is one expert of demolition in any of those movies.
Oh, so suddenly you are saying eye witnesses are not reliable, but yet you will no doubt use eye witness statements when it suits your agenda?

And secondly, whatever hit the Pentagon, it was NOT small! How many more times do I have to explain this? Damaged lamp posts over a wide area shows that something with WING SPAN hit the Pentagon. The airliner and air traffic controllers and wreckage at the Pentagon confirm this.


thank you says it all. It is you who can't step out of his own mindset since loads of docs give reasons enough as a motive!
nevertheless I'm gonna let you go ahead and attack every post in here cause this whole topic is insane in your opinion. Says it all
pentagon wreckage? a blip on a screen? the point is they got better video material.
however I'm leaving it here cause this is just rediculous. 15+ docs and still you don't get a point. all your answers are in there and next to that when you want to have an opinion you should at least be able to answer the questions you ask. (know both sides,everybody knows the official story!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!ffs)
I'm not ranting on every post in this room you smegma and the fact you lack vision you've just explained
+your style of discussion is endless since you don't belong in here.POST the NIST video (the one...) you saw or shut up in the knowledge you've told everybody what they believe is crap and they are all nutjobs!!

go in peace.....but GO

THIS is ignorance, willing ignorance !
Truthiness
New World Order- DJ Chris Geo

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0RbSZCVgl68
KJC
QUOTE(akron @ May 1 2008, 06:35 AM) *
thank you says it all. It is you who can't step out of his own mindset since loads of docs give reasons enough as a motive!
nevertheless I'm gonna let you go ahead and attack every post in here cause this whole topic is insane in your opinion. Says it all
pentagon wreckage? a blip on a screen? the point is they got better video material.
however I'm leaving it here cause this is just rediculous. 15+ docs and still you don't get a point. all your answers are in there and next to that when you want to have an opinion you should at least be able to answer the questions you ask. (know both sides,everybody knows the official story!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!ffs)
I'm not ranting on every post in this room you smegma and the fact you lack vision you've just explained
+your style of discussion is endless since you don't belong in here.POST the NIST video (the one...) you saw or shut up in the knowledge you've told everybody what they believe is crap and they are all nutjobs!!

go in peace.....but GO

THIS is ignorance, willing ignorance !


Ignorance? Both sides of the story? Just like evolution vs creationism, there is only one side of the story with credability.

And this all comes down to creadility. Let me just show how your credability and the credability of truthers as a whole is once again destroyed:

I had a deeper look at your claim that NIST does not explain the collapse of the WTC. NIST carried its analysis to the point where the buildings reached global instability. At this point, because of the magnitude of the deflections and the number of failures occuring, the computer models are not able to converge on a solution. ... "As we mentioned previously, we are not able to provide a full explanation of the total collapse." The 10,000 page NIST report describes in great depth exactly what caused the buildings to collapse, but ends when the top section of the buildings falls and global collapse begins. At this point, the collapse itself was so chaotic that it is IMPOSSIBLE for even the most powerful supercomputers to map exactly the distribution of each column as it fell, exactly what proportion of the concrete was pulverized on each floor, which parts of the building landed where, and so on. No enormous building has ever collapsed like this before. Nor would it be necessary to map the collapse itself to understand WHY they collapsed.

The purpose of the NIST report is for engineers to better understand the events leading to the collapse, to design better buildings in the future. Once a building is in the process of collapsing, providing a map of the column distributions isn't going to help anything or help prevent future failures. But, again, even if someone did want to know the path each column took and so on, it would be impossible to investigate this. What the letter is saying is that their computer models are unable to provide a full explanation of the TOTAL collapse, not the events leading up to and including the beginning of the collapse.

So basically truthers have extracted a single NIST quote, and ignored the context behind it. Just because NIST computers were not strong enough to replicate a random and chaotic collapse does not therefore mean they have no understanding of the collapse. Their models showed that the building collapsed due to fire and plane damage, that is evidence enough that this initial collapse led to global collapse. If NIST investigated and showed that the plane and fire damage could NOT initiate collapse, then maybe you would have a point, but that did not happen.
akron
QUOTE(KJC @ May 2 2008, 03:18 AM) *
Ignorance? Both sides of the story? Just like evolution vs creationism, there is only one side of the story with credability.

And this all comes down to creadility. Let me just show how your credability and the credability of truthers as a whole is once again destroyed:

I had a deeper look at your claim that NIST does not explain the collapse of the WTC. NIST carried its analysis to the point where the buildings reached global instability. At this point, because of the magnitude of the deflections and the number of failures occuring, the computer models are not able to converge on a solution. ... "As we mentioned previously, we are not able to provide a full explanation of the total collapse." The 10,000 page NIST report describes in great depth exactly what caused the buildings to collapse, but ends when the top section of the buildings falls and global collapse begins. At this point, the collapse itself was so chaotic that it is IMPOSSIBLE for even the most powerful supercomputers to map exactly the distribution of each column as it fell, exactly what proportion of the concrete was pulverized on each floor, which parts of the building landed where, and so on. No enormous building has ever collapsed like this before. Nor would it be necessary to map the collapse itself to understand WHY they collapsed.

The purpose of the NIST report is for engineers to better understand the events leading to the collapse, to design better buildings in the future. Once a building is in the process of collapsing, providing a map of the column distributions isn't going to help anything or help prevent future failures. But, again, even if someone did want to know the path each column took and so on, it would be impossible to investigate this. What the letter is saying is that their computer models are unable to provide a full explanation of the TOTAL collapse, not the events leading up to and including the beginning of the collapse.

So basically truthers have extracted a single NIST quote, and ignored the context behind it. Just because NIST computers were not strong enough to replicate a random and chaotic collapse does not therefore mean they have no understanding of the collapse. Their models showed that the building collapsed due to fire and plane damage, that is evidence enough that this initial collapse led to global collapse. If NIST investigated and showed that the plane and fire damage could NOT initiate collapse, then maybe you would have a point, but that did not happen.


Indeed just like creationism vs evolution. If I don't know what they both are I can't make up my mind about them or their legitimacy in the real world

evolve in your topic or stop repeating the official story which makes NO sense btw but the fact I'm clearly the first person explaining a lot of your own claims should say enough about your mindset concerning credibility and truth.
And btw the whole NIST report concerning nr 7 STILL isn't ready... should be easier to explain. Nevertheless you proved your ignorance conserning the subject or even the arguments made in most of these documentaries and among logical people. oh yeah wright I still didn't explain government funded that's what you still don't understand... well once you understand how and why governments work anno 2008 (corporate govt) maybe you'll get a broader picture + how little proof do you need to invade an oil region and stay there??? Open your whatever, look at some history, look at the situation and at who's saying what. America is saying everything and there isn't even a reply by osama or whatever(unless it's one of the fake ones). Also the anthrax anvelopes were american in nature. Oh wright you only talk about 9/11 period. that's your smallmindedness being problem number one to grasp the situation.


You haven't got a clue just a keyboard and the immaturity to rant in a room that handles the subject. You the man!

where is the link to the NIST video; the one ,you saw? And as usal your explanation is useless since you don't understand the validity of things, PURE ignorance
Truthiness
TELL THE TRUTH! - Immortal Technique, Mos Def, Eminem

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=USh8zul8kIQ...feature=related

Truthiness
The Fifth Estate - Conspiracy Theories (CBC 9/11 Doc)

http://video.google.com/googleplayer.swf?d...erMode=embedded
Truthiness
Everybody look what's goin' down!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KXCnzQl_rDg...feature=related
powertortoise
September Clues
What was the role of the mainstream media on 9/11?

September Clues (Google)
smarrie

The Elephant in the Room (2008) Dean Puckett:
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=47...08538&hl=en

The Elephant in the Room is a documentary following British filmmaker Dean Puckett through his journey into the 9/11 Truth Movement: a global movement of 'conspiracy theorists' who believe that the official explanation about what happened on 9/11 is totally or partially inaccurate. The filmmakers travel from middle England, across Europe and to New York for the six year anniversary of the attacks, where the film takes one final twist as we are introduced to the 9/11 first responders who are suffering from various grave health difficulties due to the toxic dust that they breathed in trying to help their country during the weeks after this tragic event. Told with a personal hands on approach that avoids advancing any one position, the film asks the question: are these crazy conspiracy theorists? Or is 9/11 Truth a credible political movement?
starfkr
Alex Jones:

THE 9/11 CHRONICALS PART 1: TRUTH RISING

maximius
screw loose change
I really dislike the 911 conspiracy people
Truthiness
QUOTE(maximius @ Oct 25 2008, 06:46 AM) *
screw loose change
I really dislike the 911 conspiracy people


My cats breath smells like cat food.
Vash419
Appreciated
krew07
I am a skeptic by nature. Mankind possesses , and continually demonstrates his innate ability to deceive,manipulate,con, commit acts of fraud,bribe, and lie to get his way. Of course if those options prove to be ineffective, torture and murder are never far behind. Plus the fact that a great deal of the population will swallow any load of shit put in front of their face. Having said that, you have to be either clinically retarded or crazier than a one eyed squirrel to not see there is some sort of cover up,and the American government is playing a part in it.

Right from start, a video that is obviously not even Bin Laden is offered to the sheeple. How on gods green earth can you believe the FBI and CIA didn't notice THIS IS NOT BIN LADEN....Now, building 7...Jesus, you could gut that thing with fire and brimstone ,let it burn till it just wont burn no more,then drop all that "debri" that supposedly fell on it, then repeat process and the steel foundation would be intact. They are built to withstand much,much,much worse. Why were our jets not scrambled to protect the most secure air space in the world? it is unheard of...........That is just the very tip.

By far ,the American government,has been involved in more false flags operations and govt coups , and more wars on foreign soil than any of its closest competitors. America has hardly stopped to wash the blood off its' hands before heading off into new campaigns. You don't get to be the only super power on earth by NOT USING YOUR MILITARY. Of course all governments are corrupt, just some are less than others.

We have satellites that can read license plates from space,we can find Saddam hiding in a hole in a very short time, YET bin Laden still at large??? We lost him?? sure whatever.

I guess this latest audio is the best the powers that be could feed the sheeple, A pathetic audio will suffice.
SL3YR
New revelations this month more and more people waking up

something NEW and BIG is just around the corner for 911 truth

peace all be safe
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2010 Invision Power Services, Inc.