QUOTE(litha @ Nov 2 2009, 03:49 PM)
Video is at least 30 fps, Higher HD is at least 60 FPS. The pentagon, I'm sure is at least HD. Its the standard now for face recognition.
The Planes estimate speed was 400 mph and you can catch it on tape. Although it will be slightly fuzzy but you will be able to see the "plane". I just have a problem on the government not releasing to video to prove its point.
"You can't show me footage of the pentagon plane therfore inside job."
Nope just something fishy or fucked up
You(truthers) disregard credible sources and make up your own "facts"(many from unreliable 3d party internet sources like "loose change") wich in turn gets treated with convoluted logic ,throw some paranoia into the mix and voila you got the" 9/11 truth movement".
But im gonna pretend I take you(truthers as in plural) seriously for a moment..
QUOTE
Claim: Two holes were visible in the Pentagon immediately after the attack: a 75-ft.-wide entry hole in the building's exterior wall, and a 16-ft.-wide hole in Ring C, the Pentagon's middle ring. Conspiracy theorists claim both holes are far too small to have been made by a Boeing 757. "How does a plane 125 ft. wide and 155 ft. long fit into a hole which is only 16 ft. across?" asks reopen911.org, a Web site "dedicated to discovering the bottom line truth to what really occurred on September 11, 2001."
The truth is of even less importance to French author Thierry Meyssan, whose baseless assertions are fodder for even mainstream European and Middle Eastern media. In his book The Big Lie, Meyssan concludes that the Pentagon was struck by a satellite-guided missile ‚šš€šš part of an elaborate U.S. military coup. "This attack," he writes, "could only be committed by United States military personnel against other U.S. military personnel."
Hole Truth: Flight 77's landing gear punched a 12-ft. hole into the Pentagon's Ring C.
FACT: When American Airlines Flight 77 hit the Pentagon's exterior wall, Ring E, it created a hole approximately 75 ft. wide, according to the ASCE Pentagon Building Performance Report. The exterior facade collapsed about 20 minutes after impact, but ASCE based its measurements of the original hole on the number of first-floor support columns that were destroyed or damaged. Computer simulations confirmed the findings.
Why wasn't the hole as wide as a 757's 124-ft.-10-in. wingspan? A crashing jet doesn't punch a cartoon-like outline of itself into a reinforced concrete building, says ASCE team member Mete Sozen, a professor of structural engineering at Purdue University. In this case, one wing hit the ground; the other was sheared off by the force of the impact with the Pentagon's load-bearing columns, explains Sozen, who specializes in the behavior of concrete buildings. What was left of the plane flowed into the structure in a state closer to a liquid than a solid mass. "If you expected the entire wing to cut into the building," Sozen tells PM, "it didn't happen."
The tidy hole in Ring C was 12 ft. wide ‚šš€šš not 16 ft. ASCE concludes it was made by the jet's landing gear, not by the fuselage.
source Claim: The damage to the Pentagon was completely inconsistent with a Boeing 757?
Truth: Studies by NIST, the ASCE and Purdue University, including computer simulations show that the damage was perfectly in keeping with a crashing airplane.
QUOTE
Flight 77 Debris
Claim: Conspiracy theorists insist there was no plane wreckage at the Pentagon. "In reality, a Boeing 757 was never found," claims pentagonstrike.co.uk, which asks the question, "What hit the Pentagon on 9/11?"
Aftermath: Wreckage from Flight 77 on the Pentagon's lawn ‚š€š proof that a passenger plane, not a missile, hit the building.
FACT: Blast expert Allyn E. Kilsheimer was the first structural engineer to arrive at the Pentagon after the crash and helped coordinate the emergency response. "It was absolutely a plane, and I'll tell you why," says Kilsheimer, CEO of KCE Structural Engineers PC, Washington, D.C. "I saw the marks of the plane wing on the face of the building. I picked up parts of the plane with the airline markings on them. I held in my hand the tail section of the plane, and I found the black box." Kilsheimer's eyewitness account is backed up by photos of plane wreckage inside and outside the building. Kilsheimer adds: "I held parts of uniforms from crew members in my hands, including body parts. Okay?"
Wonder if you can present irrefutable proof to support your theories,and not just come with wild speculations or stuff that is at best highly curcumstasial and would be thrown out in a court of law, as the burden of evidence is on your part...and your theories pretty much has been disproven?
QUOTE
"You can't show me footage of the pentagon plane therfore inside job."
Nope just something fishy or fucked up
Ok Litha..thats fair enough..Ill be the first to admit that.
My vocabulary arsenal grows when I read your posts cause I have to look up definitions. 5 in your last post ! Dipsomaniacal is my favorite new word out of that bunch. 
