QUOTE(housefan1962 @ Sep 24 2009, 08:31 PM)

This man had a special talent and gift for music and that cannot be denied. You can write that his music sucked but that is only because you either like playing devils' advocate or you just cant stand that someone had such great talent and only wanted to make ppl happy.
Im glad something affected your life, for the better, in such a profound way, but I gota call you a Donkeys Ass for this one.
You are of course entitled to your opinion of the (and any) man, but being a closed minded ass and not accepting others opinions is retarded.
I
hated Jacksons music since I was a child. Found it very annoying and never liked it. Not his music, voice, choreography, 'acting'. He brought on the wave of Pop Music that I utterly despise, and is the reason I have never been much to listen to the radio. (Puff Daddy also falls under this)
Do I think he molested kids?I dont know, and I dont care.
Was he talented? Sure, to some. But to me, he sucked. Same way people can love/hate banjo music or a movie. Talent is judged by the viewer. Because millions of people, a panel of 3 or 4 judges, or a Music tv channel says a person is talented, doesnt make it so. He/she is Talented TO THEM.
Did he do good with charities and shit? Well, a quick google came up with answers from 300 Million-500+ Million. So yes, of course he did great things with charities. But
In MY Opinion that puts him in the same category as the little old lady that donated 40 bucks to her local fire department. Gave what they could, when they could. Good for them, but even though his amount was xxxx as much, it doesnt make him better then the little old lady. He just had access to more then her.