QUOTE(colnechris @ Jun 11 2009, 01:24 PM)

im waiting fro fergies comments, because im not convinced this is his decision.
But besides that, bad business for united, cud of and shud of got more from madrid, cos lets face it there mugs. £100million for example. and add to tha a few players, VDV for 1. But if we get Villa....or a striker of his status, maybe even RVN at bargain price Ribrary and 1 midfield hardman to give our midfield that strength it lacked a little we will be orite.
still, as i say, lets see what fergie has to say on the matter.
ps, bid for messi haha,
Wrong. Bad buisness would be to keep him and allow him to walk away in a couple of years time for free. With 80 mil plus our usual transfer budget, UTD should get stronger, not weaker. All we need are the right players. If Fergie hasn't OK'd this, I'll stand naked in house of fraizer whindow in Leeds for a whole week
QUOTE(colnechris @ Jun 11 2009, 01:31 PM)

ronnie wanted to stay..........right up until the champions league final i think. seems like a paddy on his part.
VDS/Foster
Raphael Rio Vidic Evra
Ribrary Carrick Anderson/Hardman signing Tosic
Rooney
Berba/Villa or whoever
Wrong again! Ronny's wanted to leave for Madrid for two years now. It's plainly obvious to all but you
QUOTE(colnechris @ Jun 11 2009, 03:37 PM)

oh how wrong you are.
seeing as your in a worse position than us financially....dont let our larger debt make you think your not, our clubs worth much much more than yours for starters as are all our assets and our income is far bigger, our debts easily managable...if we wer to bid, say 30million+ your club would have little choice but to accept...so yeh, if united wanted torres we could pretty much be sure of getting him..dont kid yourselves with the idea he will never leave liverpool...because unfortunately for you lot, he has already said he will leave if you dont start winning.
ahhhh, now how funny would that be.
united will replace ronaldo, in time....liverpool took a long long time to replace owen when he left...
Our debt is about as managable as Pool's. We make more and are worth more, but our debts are bigger and interst repayments are higher. We're both in pretty much the same boat relatively speaking. One differance might be that glazer's are doing better financially than dick and liddy, but i don't know
QUOTE(colnechris @ Jun 11 2009, 05:55 PM)

if man utd have to sell, then be certain liverpool will, your a far smaller club than us.
what if no1 comes in to save your bacon? yep, goodbye torres, goodbye alonso, goodbye gerrard er.....yeh thats your good players in your squad, rest would fetch 30 million combined maybe 40...
so get out of dreamland will ya.
and skamp, please do 'try' to show how we are in the same situation.....because it will be funny to see what you come up with bar the fact both our owners are american.
Man UTd didn't have ti sell in the way you're making out. The only reasons they chose to sell was one, every year from now his value will drop as he contracts gets nearer to the end (until eventually he can move for free). Two, it's a fooking lot of money (enough to make us stronger) and three, he doesn't want to play for UTD anymore and hasn't for sometime.
Chris, you talk a lot of rubbish